search  current discussion  categories  philosophy 

kill the artists etc.

updated wed 23 jan 02

 

Randy Peckham on tue 22 jan 02


I would think it is up to the institution to decide it's operating
procedure regarding experienced potters using the facilities. If the
experienced potters use too many resources, give too little to the
department, and don't pay enough to cover expenses, that is the problem of
the school, and it's policy regarding this group. Schools have rules, we
all know it. Change the rules to make the experienced potters more
effective. Make them load kilns, mix glazes, give demos, etc. Make it
part of what they have to do to qualify for the class the next semester,
whatever. Don't throw the baby out with the bath water, be selective, it's
expected. Independent study is coursework, can be graded, and can be
failed. Where I went to school if you fell below a certain academic
level, you were removed. There were no people hanging around soaking up
the ambiance. You came in, you did what you were told, or you left. By
the time I graduated over 3/4 of the people I started with were gone.

As far as people feeling that they are abusing the situation, don't. If
you feel guilty ask what you can do to make a difference. Maybe they
really do want the osmosis that comes with you, and maybe you really aren't
a burden. Maybe you are a greatly desired inspiration. Maybe you show
students what it means to be what they are studying to be.

I would like to take a class someday, and I would consider having
experienced people working in the studio to be an immense benefit to my
learning curve. If there are only the teachers, and people taught by those
teachers, the realm of exposure will be stunted. I wouldn't pay money for
a course like that, when I could just buy the video.