search  current discussion  categories  techniques - photography 

digital vs slides opinion?

updated wed 13 feb 08

 

Rick Mahaffey on sun 10 feb 08


Tony wrote:

The new standard for the web is 96 dpi, not 72.

Tony,

First, thanks for your informative and well thought out posts on this topic.

The above statement you made in your post makes me think that if I want to
be able to use my digital images well into the future I need to be way above
the 300 DPI because the standard is going to change at some point and higher
resolution will be required.

I have heard that there are instances where only an unaltered RAW format
image will be accepted for entry. Have you run into this?

I always shoot RAW images (I like the chance to correct any white balance
errors that I might make later).

I also cannot agree more with your statement about working native and saving
versions. I always save the original and then do a "save as" and start my
editing. I want to have the original source material.

Thank you again,
Rick Mahaffey
Tacoma, WA, USA

Lee on tue 12 feb 08


On Feb 11, 2008 3:27 PM, Rick Mahaffey wrote:
> Tony wrote:
>
> The new standard for the web is 96 dpi, not 72.

I think 96dpi is important for projection with the new higher
resolution projectors.

> The above statement you made in your post makes me think that if I want to
> be able to use my digital images well into the future I need to be way above
> the 300 DPI because the standard is going to change at some point and higher
> resolution will be required.

Like the chart I uploaded shows, dpi is a product of the megapixels
and size of the printed image. You can have 600 or 900 dpi in a low
resolution camera, if you have a very small "postage stamp" size
printed image.


--
Lee in Mashiko, Tochigi Japan
http://mashikopots.blogspot.com/

"Tea is nought but this: first you heat the water, then you make the
tea. Then you drink it properly. That is all you need to know."
--Sen No Rikyu
"Let the beauty we love be what we do." - Rumi

Tony Ferguson on tue 12 feb 08


Lee and others,

There is a difference between dpi and the physical size as Lee said. You could have a postage sized stamp image that is 1400 dpi but when scaled to 8x10 its 72 dpi (or exactly whatever it is). People often confuse the physical size, print size, and the dpi. They are all separate things that are tied to the image and when one is adjusted the others are too.

Tony


Lee wrote: On Feb 11, 2008 3:27 PM, Rick Mahaffey wrote:
> Tony wrote:
>
> The new standard for the web is 96 dpi, not 72.

I think 96dpi is important for projection with the new higher
resolution projectors.

> The above statement you made in your post makes me think that if I want to
> be able to use my digital images well into the future I need to be way above
> the 300 DPI because the standard is going to change at some point and higher
> resolution will be required.

Like the chart I uploaded shows, dpi is a product of the megapixels
and size of the printed image. You can have 600 or 900 dpi in a low
resolution camera, if you have a very small "postage stamp" size
printed image.


--
Lee in Mashiko, Tochigi Japan
http://mashikopots.blogspot.com/

"Tea is nought but this: first you heat the water, then you make the
tea. Then you drink it properly. That is all you need to know."
--Sen No Rikyu
"Let the beauty we love be what we do." - Rumi

______________________________________________________________________________
Clayart members may send postings to: clayart@lsv.ceramics.org

You may look at the archives for the list, post messages, change your
subscription settings or unsubscribe/leave the list here: http://www.acers.org/cic/clayart/

Moderator of the list is Mel Jacobson who may be reached at melpots2@visi.com




Tony Ferguson
315 N. Lake Ave. Apt 312
Duluth, MN 55806
...where the sky meets the lake...

Artist, Educator, Photographer, Film Maker, Web Meister
fergyart@yahoo.com
(218) 727-6339
http://www.tonyferguson.net





---------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.